Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Hamad Medjedovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fokina vs Medjedovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Hamad Medjedovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fokina 0 - 1 Medjedovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fokina has won 51.8% of points on his second serve, while Medjedovic has won 53.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fokina, in recent form, has won 49.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medjedovic has won 50.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.74% and 32.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fokina has saved 58.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medjedovic has saved 57.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fokina has won 48% of matches played (W/L 24/ 26), with Medjedovic winning 66% (W/L 33/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fokina has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 109/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 23/ 28). Medjedovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Fokina has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Medjedovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 10/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fokina winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fokina winning 0 and Medjedovic winning 2. The last match between Fokina and Medjedovic was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 11-05-2024, Second, Clay with Hamad Medjedovic getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fokina and Medjedovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fokina winning 0 times and Medjedovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fokina winning 0, and Medjedovic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fokina has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.2 while Medjedovic has played against players with an average rank of 227.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fokina has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medjedovic has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fokina has converted 37.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medjedovic has converted 45.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
34
Rank
21
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
134
Rank
102
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
58% (254-186)
Career Total W/L
63% (114-68)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
64% (9-5)
$4,013,065
Career Prize Money
$362,660
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fokina VS Medjedovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:15 | 1:47:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (52/77) | 57% (39/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (31/52) | 74% (29/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (15/25) | 59% (17/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (22/68) | 40% (31/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Fokina VS Medjedovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 64% (9/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (21/26) | 61% (20/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (225/237) | 54% (168/142) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 80% (8/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.76 |
| Aces Total | 90 | 115 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 201.75 | 201.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (994/1467) | 63% (586/933) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (679/994) | 73% (428/586) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (245/473) | 54% (187/347) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (47/124) | 46% (42/92) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (554/1502) | 40% (382/961) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 29% (2/5) | 78% (7/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 64% (9/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 50% (6/3) |
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
74%
(
86 of
117)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
51 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(10) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alexei Popyrin
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Jeff Wolf
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Laurent Lokoli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
20
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Francisco Comesana
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Hugo Gaston
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fokina Vs Medjedovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
